Not a day goes by where I don't hear someone quote Jakob
Nielsen to me. In fact, he seems to come up more often than
Jesus.
In the 60's John Lennon thought the Beatles were more
popular than Jesus. In the context of his observation, he was
right and therein lies the problem.
Context is generally intangible, something undefined and at
the time of comment, not high on the priority list. It is only
when a statement, comment or work is taken out of
context that the importance of establishing its originating
circumstance comes to the fore.
Context is important. It provides a key to understanding
and a key to communicating. Using a statement in context may
save hundreds of words and enable an idea to be distilled into
one short grab line. Conversely, a grab line out of context
can be easily misunderstood and create numerous problems in
reparation and damage control.
So the problem for the usability religion is that there are
no hard and fast rules, yet everyone keeps quoting them -
relaying sermons from the messiah, Jakob Nielsen. After all,
who can disagree with the worlds most renowned usability
expert?
A website shouldn't and cant be everything to everybody.
In fact, no communication can be everything to everybody. You
have to know who you are talking to.
Over the last 4 years Thinking has focused on a key
contextual emotion - affinity. Strangely, this single emotion
provides us with more internet success than anything else.
Using this focus, we end up with sites that are sticky, have
long session times, high customer satisfaction, high site
loyalty and most importantly, appear to have spirit. That's
right, spirit!
The spirit of a site is bound by its context. My office
looks out at a cafe and a pub and has three more cafes, a pub,
two wine bars and three restaurants behind it (as they say in
real estate - position, position, position). All of these
venues essentially do the same thing yet each does it in a
different context - flashy, ye olde worlde, cocktail lounge
and a few are just joints. This contextual differentiator
creates its own distinct character, appeal and client
audience.
I would doubt if these venues patrons only frequented
the one place for all their food and beverages. It would
depend on the time of the day, where they were and what they
wanted to eat - they would have their favourites but all in
context. However, when it comes to websites, many website
owners expect their patrons to go nowhere else. I'd be
surprised if any of the abovementioned establishment owners
thought they were everything to everybody, so why do websites.
Cafes are not cocktail lounges and pubs dont do takeaway
sandwiches. Understand the context of your website and stick
to it.